|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
not logged in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
TE Activity: Does Your Chewing Gum Lose Its Flavor? Contributed by: Engineering K-Ph.D. Program, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University
Pre-Req Knowledge (Return to Contents)
Learning Objectives (Return to Contents)
Materials List (Return to Contents)
Introduction/Motivation (Return to Contents) See How Much Sugar is in Bubble Gum? Introduction/Motivation section. No additional introduction should be needed. Procedure (Return to Contents)
Let students compare their results with those of other students. Then show students the original gum package, which lists the ingredients and gives nutritional information. Have the students calculate the percent of sugar in the gum based on the package information. Compare this "theoretical" percentage to the "experimental" percentages. The two will be fairly close for most students. Discuss sources of error for the experiment. Then ask if there was a control for the experiment. The answer is no, and this is an important point to make. How do we know that an unchewed piece of gum wouldn't lose just as much mass by sitting and drying for the same amount of time in the same place that a chewed piece did? (We don't.) What should the control have been? Give students time to think about this. Some will be able to answer that they should have removed a piece of gum from its wrapper and found its mass, but then, instead of chewing it, simply left it on the tray along with the chewed pieces of gum. Then, at the end of the experiment, it would have been re-weighed to find out if its mass changed. Ask also which variables were controlled and which were not. Everyone chewed for the same amount of time, but did everyone chew at the same rate or with the same vigor? Did some students chew less because they spent a lot of time blowing bubbles? Did everyone chew the same type of gum? Might some people have more or "stronger" saliva than others?
Questions that can be answered through experimentation should arise naturally from the discussion of the first experiment, and students should also welcome the opportunity to chew gum in class again. Have students work in groups of four to make a written proposal. The proposal should answer these questions:
Model answering these questions by applying them to the initial gum experiment. Ask students for the answers to each of the questions as they apply to the first experiment. They may need time to think about some of the questions, but they should be able to respond:
Make sure students understand the questions, and the answers that apply for the first experiment. Then give students time (20 minutes or so) to agree on questions within their groups and write down their answers to the questions as they apply to their proposed experiment. Each group should come up with its own question and experiment, although some groups may independently generate the same ones. The following are some examples of student questions and their corresponding hypotheses that turned into successful experiments in the past:
After the teams get your approval, have them submit their shopping lists, including brand names and number of pieces required. Obtain the gum (students could be asked to provide it if necessary) and let them conduct their experiments. Safety Issues (Return to Contents)
Troubleshooting Tips (Return to Contents)
Investigating Questions (Return to Contents)
Assessment (Return to Contents)
Activity Extensions (Return to Contents) If new questions arise from their experiments, students can design and conduct new experiments to answer them. Activity Scaling (Return to Contents) Acknowledgements: Younger students (6th grade) may need help in calculating the percent of sugar in chewing gum. Other Related Information (Return to Contents)
Contributors Mary R. Hebrank, Project Writer and Consultant, Duke UniversityCopyright © 2004 by Engineering K-Ph.D. Program, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke Universityincluding copyrighted works from other educational institutions and/or U.S. government agencies; all rights reserved. Supporting Program (Return to Contents) Engineering K-Ph.D. Program, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke UniversityLast Modified: September 26, 2008
|
K12 engineering curriculum
K-12 engineering curricula
K12 engineering curricula
K-12 engineering activities
K12 engineering activities
K-12 engineering lessons
K12 engineering lessons
Engineering for children
Engineering activities for children
K-12 science activities
K12 science activities
K-12 science lessons
K12 science lessons
linker
Are you a bot?
|
Use of the TeachEngineering digital library and this website constitutes acceptance of our
Terms of Use and
Privacy Policy.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||