Quick Look
Grade Level: 10 (9-12)
Time Required: 30 minutes
Expendable Cost/Group: US $0.00 (See the Materials List for details.)
Group Size: 2
Activity Dependency: None
Subject Areas: Science and Technology
Quick Look
- Grade Level:
- 10 (9-12)
- Time Required:
- 30 minutes
- Expendable Cost/Group
:
Although no charge or fee is required for using TeachEngineering curricular materials in your classroom, the lessons and activities often require material supplies.
The expendable cost is the estimated cost of supplies needed for each group of students involved in the activity.
Any reusable equipment that is necessary to teach the activity is not included in this estimate; see the Materials List/Supplies for details.
- US $0.00
(See the Materials List for details.)
- Group Size:
- 2
- Activity Dependency
Activity dependency indicates that this activity relies upon the contents of the TeachEngineering document(s) listed.:
- None
- Subject Areas:
- Science and Technology
Summary
Students are introduced to graphical analysis of data to analyze flaws in a transit system's design. They evaluate factors such as ride time, wait time and percentage of train capacity. This activity requires the use of the Mass Transit Living Lab—a web portal to interactive train (transit) traffic data for a major metropolitan city.Engineering Connection
Transportation engineers are responsible for designing and operating the transit systems that deliver people and goods, including rail, highways and roads, and air traffic. Transportation engineers aim to design efficient systems that move people and goods quickly, safely and cost-effectively. Students become fully immersed in transportation engineering during this activity.
Learning Objectives
After this activity, students should be able to:
- Plot simple variables versus time on graph paper.
- Calculate percentages and graph them versus time on graph paper.
- Answer questions quantitatively using information obtained from a graph.
Educational Standards
Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science,
technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.
All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standards Network (ASN),
a project of D2L (www.achievementstandards.org).
In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics;
within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.
Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.
All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standards Network (ASN), a project of D2L (www.achievementstandards.org).
In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics; within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.
NGSS: Next Generation Science Standards - Science
-
Use mathematical representations of phenomena or design solutions to describe and/or support claims and/or explanations.
(Grades 9 - 12 )
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
-
Use mathematical models and/or computer simulations to predict the effects of a design solution on systems and/or the interactions between systems.
(Grades 9 - 12 )
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
Common Core State Standards - Math
-
Use units as a way to understand problems and to guide the solution of multi-step problems; choose and interpret units consistently in formulas; choose and interpret the scale and the origin in graphs and data displays.
(Grades 9 - 12 )
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
-
Represent data with plots on the real number line (dot plots, histograms, and box plots).
(Grades 9 - 12 )
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
International Technology and Engineering Educators Association - Technology
-
Evaluate the design solution using conceptual, physical, and mathematical models at various intervals of the design process in order to check for proper design and to note areas where improvements are needed.
(Grades 9 - 12 )
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
State Standards
Colorado - Math
-
Use units as a way to understand problems and to guide the solution of multi-step problems.
(Grades
9 -
12 )
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
-
Visual displays and summary statistics condense the information in data sets into usable knowledge.
(Grades
9 -
12 )
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
-
Represent data with plots on the real number line (dot plots, histograms, and box plots).
(Grades
9 -
12 )
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
Materials List
Each group needs:
- 1 straight edge or ruler
- worksheet
- graph paper or engineering paper, if you do not wish to use the included graph space
- computer with Internet access
Worksheets and Attachments
Visit [www.teachengineering.org/activities/view/csm_fastracks_lesson1_activity2_tg] to print or download.More Curriculum Like This
Students evaluate whether a particular section of a transit system is functioning in an efficient manner and whether it is meeting design requirements. Then, they suggest design improvements and evaluate whether the changes make positive impacts on the transit system performance.
Students go through the logical process of quantitatively analyzing real-world transit data. They gain experience identifying problems with the current design based upon their earlier observations and experiences in activities 1 and 2.
Students go through the process of identifying possible solutions to the design problems that the existing west corridor transit system faces. Students combine what they have learned from the three previous activities to come up with possible solutions to the design problems faced by the system.
Students are introduced to the concept of design criteria. Specifically, they determine what functionality the trains on the west corridor must meet to satisfy customer and owner needs. Students discuss what criteria need to be met and use the Mass Transit Living Lab—a web portal to interactive trai...
Introduction/Motivation
To better understand how a transit system evolves with time, engineers often graph different system parameters against the time of day that the system is in use. These graphs are helpful to quickly visually analyze design problems and investigate solutions. Graphs are also an important tool engineers use to present technical information to policy makers and the public in a manner that is informative to everyone.
Procedure
- Go to http://www.teachengineering.org/livinglabs/index.php > and click to enter the Mass Transit Living Lab to reach the main page of the Mass Transit Living Lab website (see Figure 1)
Figure 1. The main page of the Mass Transit Living Lab website - Distribute to students the Graphing the West Corridor Data Worksheet (for activity 2).
- Present the Introduction/Motivation content to students.
- Divide the class into teams of two students each, or have them work individually.
- Direct students to work through the worksheet questions.
Assessment
Grade the completed worksheets, reviewing student answers to gauge their mastery of the concepts.
Other Related Information
This activity is designed around the Mass Transit Living Lab, a real-time simulation of FasTracks—a real, high-speed rail transit system in the Denver, CO, metropolitan area, as an example for analyzing data about how a light rail system works.
Contributors
Mike Mooney; Stuart FehrCopyright
© 2013 by Regents of the University of Colorado; original © 2005 Colorado School of MinesSupporting Program
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Colorado School of MinesAcknowledgements
This curriculum was created with support from the National Science Foundation. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policies of the National Science Foundation, and you should not assume endorsement by the federal government.
Last modified: March 20, 2019
Comments