Students observe how water acts differently when placed on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. They determine which coatings are best to cause surfaces to shed water quickly or reduce the "fogging" caused by condensation.
Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.
All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standard Network (ASN), a project of JES & Co. (www.jesandco.org).
In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics; within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.
Click on the standard groupings to explore this hierarchy as it applies to this document.
- International Technology and Engineering Educators Association: Technology
- F. Knowledge gained from other fields of study has a direct effect on the development of technological products and systems. (Grades 6 - 8)  ...show
- K. Humans devise technologies to reduce the negative consequences of other technologies. (Grades 9 - 12)  ...show
- Q. Chemical technologies provide a means for humans to alter or modify materials and to produce chemical products. (Grades 9 - 12)  ...show
- Next Generation Science Standards: Science
- Plan and conduct an investigation to gather evidence to compare the structure of substances at the bulk scale to infer the strength of electrical forces between particles. (Grades 9 - 12)  ...show
- North Carolina: Science
- Describe the behavior of water on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces and explain in general terms what causes the differences in behavior.
- Discuss situations in which applying a hydrophilic or hydrophobic surface would be advantageous.
- 3-5 pre-treated microscope slides
- magnifying glass
- hot plate
- lab gloves
- eye protection
- Investigating Contact Angle Worksheet, one per student
- 2-4 types of water-repellent products with which to pre-treat glass slides for each team, such as Rain-X® Glass Treatment ($9), Rain-X® Anti-Fog™ ($8), Rain-X® 2-in-1 Glass Cleaner and Rain Repellent ($7), and G-Glass® Totally Green Hydrophobic Rain Repellent ($7)
- marker or wax pencil to label glass slides
- (optional) paper towels, sponge, mop, in case of spills
- What causes fog to be hard to see through? ...Either fog in the atmosphere, or fogging that you see on glass or mirrors or goggles? (Even though they're not the same thing, both atmospheric fog and "window" fog are made of tiny droplets of water. In both cases, the tiny droplets scatter light in all directions rather than allowing light to pass straight through.)
- Would increasing or decreasing the attraction of the water for the glass improve visibility on the inside of a car window? What could you do to make visibility better? (If you caused the water to spread out and form a layer of water rather than droplets [increased the attraction], it would get rid of the fogginess and improve visibility because you can see through a very thin layer of water. You want the surface to be hydrophilic, or "water loving." You could apply a hydrophilic anti-fog coating to the glass so that any condensation forms into a thin, even layer of water instead of droplets and the glass remains transparent.)
- To see better through a windshield being pounded with rain, how would you want the water to behave? Do you want the water to stick to the surface or roll off of it? What could you do to make visibility better? (With so much water, you want it to form droplets, not spread out. You want the surface to be hydrophobic or "water-hating," so the water moves off the glass as quickly as possible. You could apply a hydrophobic rain-repellant glass treatment to the outside of the windshield to cause water to bead and roll off the surface easily.)
- And what do contact angles have to do with it? (A contact angle is a liquid's tendency to either bead or sheet on a solid surface and is determined by the properties of both the surface and the liquid.)
- So, when would it be advantageous to use a hydrophobic material? When would it be advantageous to use a hydrophilic material? (See pre-assessment activity in the Assessment section.)
Before the Activity
- For each team, coat a set of 3-5 glass slides, each with different surface treatments. Label them A-E. (Note: only A, B and C are necessary for this lab.) For example: A = Untreated glass, B = Rain-X® Glass Treatment, C = Rain-X® Anti-Fog™, D = Rain-X® 2-in-1 Glass Cleaner, and Rain Repellent E = G-Glass® Totally Green Hydrophobic Rain Repellent.
- Gather materials and organize the lab stations.
- Make copies of the Investigating Contact Angle Worksheet and The Charges of Water Worksheet.
With the Students
- Have students place a water droplet on each slide and make observations about its appearance (see Figure 1).
- Tilt each slide and observe the motion of the water droplet. Make observations and sketches.
- Record the type of surface behavior (hydrophilic or hydrophobic) for each slide.
- Have students make predictions about which type of surface treatment will allow water to flow off the slide the fastest.
- Fill a small beaker with water.
- Pour water down the side of each slide and record observations.
- Decide which surface treatment was best for shedding rain during a storm.
- Fill a beaker with water and place it on a hot plate. Turn heat to medium.
- Once water is hot, but not boiling, hold each glass slide above the beaker for 30 seconds. Note whether the slide has collected condensation and whether visibility has been reduced by the slide becoming foggy (see Figure 2).
- After the lab is finished, lead a class discussion comparing results and answers.
- Have students guess which coating came from which product. Once students have decided, reveal the product on each slide to see if they were right.
- Assign students to do a web search for hydrophobic and hydrophilic products and report on their findings, as described in the Assessment section.
- Wear gloves when handling coated glass slides.
- Inform students of proper procedures for disposal of broken glass.
- Have paper towels and a mop handy in case of water spills.
- For Part A, remind students that when they pour water down the slides, to do it over a sink.
- For Part C: Hot plates should not be turned up to full power. The water should be hot, but not boiling.
- For Part C: Remind students that hot glass may not look hot.
- Especially for Part C, wear safety goggles.
- When would it be advantageous to use a hydrophobic material? (Hydrophobic surfaces protect objects from water and stains, think of rain coats, outdoor furniture cushions, self-cleaning fabrics, paper cups and plates, boat hulls and decks, table and kitchen surfaces, and automobile waxes.)
- When would it be advantageous to use a hydrophilic material? (Hydrophilic surfaces help with minimizing fogging, items such as water hoses that need to allow liquids to flow easily and surfaces to be painted so they will accept the coating better.)
Activity Embedded Assessment
- Predicting and testing how changing the contact angle between water and glass changes the visibility of glass in a rainstorm.
- Predicting and testing how changing the contact angle between water and glass changes the fogging properties of glass.
- What is the product name?
- What company manufactures it?
- Where is it sold?
- How does its hydrophobic or hydrophilic properties improve the product? (benefits)
- How much does the product cost?
- Are any safety precautions suggested for when using this product?
Additional Multimedia Support
de Gennes, Pierre-Gilles. "Wetting—Statics and Dynamics." Reviews of Modern Physics, American Physical Society. 57 (1985): 827-863. Accessed September 1, 2010. http://rmp.aps.org/abstract/RMP/v57/i3/p827_1
de Gennes, Pierre-Gilles, et al. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves. New York, NY: Springer, 2004. (Engineering connections.)
Jean Stave, Durham Public Schools, NC, Professor Chuan-Hua Chen, Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Pratt School of Engineering, Jonathan Boreyko, Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Pratt School of Engineering
© 2013 by Regents of the University of Colorado; original © 2011 Duke University
NSF CAREER Award and RET Program, Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University
Last modified: November 26, 2015