SummaryConcluding the Asteroid Impact challenge, students build model caverns and bury them in a tray of sand. They test the models by dropping a heavy ball onto them to simulate an asteroid hitting the Earth. By molding papier-mâché or clay around balloons (to form domes), or around small cardboard boxes (to form rectangular structures), students create unique models of their cavern designs. Examining how their structures survived the asteroid impact, students make improvements and impact test again, experiencing design iteration. Teams each make two mini class presentations to show the sustained damage, explain their intended improvements, and report on the success of their updated designs.
A vital part of the engineering design process involves testing possible and final solutions. This often involves building scaled models of a design solution and testing it. Lessons learned from the testing informs further improvement in the design evolution.
After this activity, students should be able to:
- Working with pre-determined design constraints, use papier-mâché to create a model structure.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of a structure against impact failure.
- Continue an iterative design process.
More Curriculum Like This
Students learn about nondestructive testing, the use of the finite element method (systems of equations) and real-world impacts, and then conduct mini-activities to apply Maxwell’s equations, generate currents, create magnetic fields and solve a system of equations. They see the value of NDE and FEM...
Students apply the mechanical advantages and problem-solving capabilities of six types of simple machines (wedge, wheel and axle, lever, inclined plane, screw, pulley) as they discuss modern structures in the spirit of the engineers and builders of the great pyramids.
After learning, comparing and contrasting the steps of the engineering design process (EDP) and scientific method, students review the human skeletal system, including the major bones, bone types, bone functions and bone tissues, as well as other details about bone composition. Students then pair-re...
Students take a close look at truss structures, the geometric shapes that compose them, and the many variations seen in bridge designs in use every day. Through a guided worksheet, students draw assorted 2D and 3D polygon shapes and think through their forms and interior angles (mental “testing”) be...
Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science,
technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.
All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standards Network (ASN),
a project of D2L (www.achievementstandards.org).
In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics;
within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.
Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.
All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standards Network (ASN), a project of D2L (www.achievementstandards.org).
In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics; within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.
- Develop a model to generate data for iterative testing and modification of a proposed object, tool, or process such that an optimal design can be achieved. (Grades 6 - 8) Details... View more aligned curriculum... Do you agree with this alignment? Thanks for your feedback!
- Construct an explanation based on evidence for how geoscience processes have changed Earth's surface at varying time and spatial scales. (Grades 6 - 8) Details... View more aligned curriculum... Do you agree with this alignment? Thanks for your feedback!
- Develop and communicate an evidence based scientific explanation around one or more factors that change Earth's surface (Grade 5) Details... View more aligned curriculum... Do you agree with this alignment? Thanks for your feedback!
- Analyze and interpret data identifying ways Earth's surface is constantly changing through a variety of processes and forces such as plate tectonics, erosion, deposition, solar influences, climate, and human activity (Grade 5) Details... View more aligned curriculum... Do you agree with this alignment? Thanks for your feedback!
- Gather, analyze, and communicate data that explains Earth's plates, plate motions, and the results of plate motions (Grade 7) Details... View more aligned curriculum... Do you agree with this alignment? Thanks for your feedback!
- papier-mâché or clay (not modeling clay)
- medium-sized balloons
- small cardboard boxes
- large plastic tubs
- small bowling ball, or other ~5 -to 7-pound object, to simulate an asteroid
- assorted additional materials that could be used to form model cavern structures, such as cleaned containers found in the recycling bin
- (optional) photographs of real impact craters on the Earth and the Moon
Now that all your hard work is done, we are going to build model caverns and test them!
Before the Activity
- Gather materials.
- If possible, find some photographs to show students of real impact craters on the Earth and the Moon.
With the Students
- Give students the choice of modeling their caverns as domes or flat-roofed structures.
- Give groups papier-mâché (or clay) and let them build their caverns.
- Let the models to set up overnight. If clay is used, the drying time may need to be extended to two to three days.
- Once dry, have each student engineering team test its cavern design.
- Start by burying the cavern in the sand. Make sure that the cavern is about 6 inches under the sand surface.
- Drop the bowling ball (or other object) from a height of 2-3 feet onto the sand.
- Excavate the cavern and inspect the damage.
- Have students present their tested caverns to the class and identify the damage that was done, if any.
- Have students come up with at least two changes that could be made to improve the design. If the cavern was not damaged, facilitate a discussion of over-design and cost versus performance.
- Have students make a new cavern with the design changes discussed during the presentation. Repeat the drying and testing steps, and then have students present their updated design and conclude by explaining whether or not and how the changes (design iteration) resulted in better performance.
- To conclude, discuss the results of the impact testing. See the Assessment section for suggested questions.
Concluding Discussion: Lead a class discussion to share and compare team results and conclusions. Evaluate student comprehension through their answers and contributions. Ask the class:
- What did you observe during the testing?
- What happened to each of the various models in the simulated impacts?
- With what you learned, would you make any changes to your team's final cavern design?
- If you had more time, what other tests and data might you do in order to obtain get more information that would help you make good decisions about creating safe underground shelters?
- Which team proposal(s) should the governor choose? And why?
For upper grades, as a way to more closely align this activity to the various rock types found in Alabraska, provide additional impact testing materials in addition to sand. Use flour to represent a softer material, sand to represent a moderately strong material, and gravel to represent a harder material. Have students select an impact material based on what rock type they decided to build their cavern in, or have each group pick an impact material at random for the sake of experimentation by the entire class.
Copyright© 2013 by Regents of the University of Colorado; original © 2005 Colorado School of Mines
Supporting ProgramAdventure Engineering, Colorado School of Mines
Adventure Engineering was supported by National Science Foundation grant nos. DUE 9950660 and GK-12 0086457. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policies of the National Science Foundation, and you should not assume endorsement by the federal government.
Last modified: August 17, 2018