Hands-on Activity Angular Velocity:
Sweet Wheels

Quick Look

Grade Level: 9 (8-11)

Time Required: 1 hours 30 minutes

(can be split into two 45-minute sessions)

Expendable Cost/Group: US $0.00

This activity uses some non-expendable (reusable) items, mainly LEGO robot kits and software; see the Materials List for details.

Group Size: 3

Activity Dependency: None

Subject Areas: Algebra, Measurement, Number and Operations, Physics, Reasoning and Proof, Science and Technology

NGSS Performance Expectations:

NGSS Three Dimensional Triangle
HS-ETS1-2

Two photographs: A finished LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robot with two larger-sized wheels installed. The two LEGO wheels used in this activity with 8.25 cm and 5.5 cm diameters.
A LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robot and its different wheel sizes.
copyright
Copyright © 2014 AMPS, NYU-Poly

Summary

Students analyze the relationship between wheel radius, linear velocity and angular velocity by using LEGO® MINDSTORMS® EV3 robots. Given various robots with different wheel sizes and fixed motor speeds, they predict which has the fastest linear velocity. Then student teams collect and graph data to analyze the relationships between wheel size and linear velocity and find the angular velocity of the robot given its motor speed. Students explore other ways to increase linear velocity by changing motor speeds, and discuss and evaluate the optimal wheel size and desired linear velocities on vehicles.
This engineering curriculum aligns to Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).

Engineering Connection

Being able to isolate one target variable and observe how it changes while holding all other possible variables constant helps engineers of all disciplines better understand how the target variable works within the constraints of the system. Engineering examples of isolating variables to observe how they respond in a constrained system include the stress testing of materials, integration of wireless transceivers, and culturing of proteins for specific tasks. As another example, when a company tests a new fertilizer, it uses standard soil conditions and a constant test plant with a known growth pattern in order to isolate the fertilizer as the variable. To test, the fertilizer is fed to a group of plants and their growth patterns are compared to the patterns of the constant ("control") plants that did not receive the fertilizer. Data analysis indicates whether or not the company should market the compound (due to positive results) or do more testing. In this activity, to determine what wheel configurations result in the robot traveling a 200-cm distance in the fastest time, students isolate and observe the wheel size variable, while constraining the problem to have the same power level and frame.

Learning Objectives

After this activity, students should be able to:

  • Describe the relationship between wheel radius, diameter, angular velocity and linear velocity.
  • Change a robot's motor speed and wheel radius/diameter to produce various linear velocities.
  • Evaluate the design choice of different wheel sizes on various types of vehicles.

Educational Standards

Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.

All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standards Network (ASN), a project of D2L (www.achievementstandards.org).

In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics; within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.

NGSS Performance Expectation

HS-ETS1-2. Design a solution to a complex real-world problem by breaking it down into smaller, more manageable problems that can be solved through engineering. (Grades 9 - 12)

Do you agree with this alignment?

Click to view other curriculum aligned to this Performance Expectation
This activity focuses on the following Three Dimensional Learning aspects of NGSS:
Science & Engineering Practices Disciplinary Core Ideas Crosscutting Concepts
Design a solution to a complex real-world problem, based on scientific knowledge, student-generated sources of evidence, prioritized criteria, and tradeoff considerations.

Alignment agreement:

Criteria may need to be broken down into simpler ones that can be approached systematically, and decisions about the priority of certain criteria over others (trade-offs) may be needed.

Alignment agreement:

  • Interpret the slope (rate of change) and the intercept (constant term) of a linear model in the context of the data. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Represent data on two quantitative variables on a scatter plot, and describe how the variables are related. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Rearrange formulas to highlight a quantity of interest, using the same reasoning as in solving equations. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Fit a linear function for a scatter plot that suggests a linear association. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • A prototype is a working model used to test a design concept by making actual observations and necessary adjustments. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Illustrate principles, elements, and factors of design. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Synthesize data and analyze trends to make decisions about technological products, systems, or processes. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Rearrange formulas to highlight a quantity of interest, using the same reasoning as in solving equations. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Fit a linear function for a scatter plot that suggests a linear association. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Represent data on two quantitative variables on a scatter plot, and describe how the variables are related. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Interpret the slope (rate of change) and the intercept (constant term) of a linear model in the context of the data. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Design a solution to a complex real-world problem by breaking it down into smaller, more manageable problems that can be solved through engineering. (Grades 9 - 12) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

Suggest an alignment not listed above

Materials List

Each group needs:

Note: This activity can also be conducted with the older (and no longer sold) LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT set instead of EV3; see below for those supplies:

  • LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT Base Set; from this set, the following items are used: the NXT intelligent brick, 1 touch sensor, 2 cables to connect the motors to the brick, wheels of different sizes, and additional LEGO parts
  • computer loaded with the NXT 2.1 software

To share with the entire class:

  • painter's tape, for marking distances on the ground
  • yard or meter stick
  • LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 Software 1.2.1, free online, you have to register a LEGO account first; at https://www.lego.com/en-us/mindstorms/downloads/download-software; the software is required to download the attached rbt program to the EV3 brick
  • computer, loaded with EV3 1.2.1 software

Note: As an alternative to the LEGO EV3 robot, many other viable alternative robot kits exist that allow you to vary the speed of the motor that controls the wheels. For example: LEGO MINDSTORMS EV2, Parallax Boe-Bot Robot. See the Additional Multimedia Support section for details and links.

Worksheets and Attachments

Visit [www.teachengineering.org/activities/view/nyu_angularvelocity_activity1] to print or download.

Pre-Req Knowledge

Prior to the activity, students should be:

  • Comfortable with substituting and manipulating equations.
  • Comfortable plotting data and estimating a line of best fit for that data.
  • Able to determine the equation for the line of best fit drawn on a graph.
  • Familiar with linear velocity (speed) and the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity (linear velocity = angular velocity x radius) and have practiced problems at a comprehension level.

Introduction/Motivation

Why do average cars use 16- to 17-inch tires and drag racers use 24-inch and even larger tires? Why do different vehicles have different tire dimensions? Which person is moving faster if both are turning at the same rate: a child in a kiddie Ferris wheel with a diameter of 12 foot 6 inches or an adult in a larger Ferris wheel with a diameter of 180 feet? How do they compare to the world's tallest Ferris wheel, the High Roller in Las Vegas, built with a diameter of 520 feet? Angular velocity—how fast a point on a circle is changing position—and radius both affect linear velocity—how fast an object is moving in a straight line. Engineers consider tire sizes when designing vehicles and must test variables like radius and angular velocity in order to develop optimal designs.

The radius of a tire can affect the speed of a vehicle because of the relationship between linear velocity, wheel radius and angular velocity. Other factors may also affect a car's speed, such as weight, torque and friction. Today we are going to examine wheel sizes on EV3 robots to see how the wheel radius affects the speed of the robot—just like an engineer would. But what about the angular velocity? If we know the wheel radius and the speed of a vehicle, can we calculate the angular velocity of the tires? What aspects of a vehicle control its angular velocity? Let's find out!

Procedure

Before the Activity

  • Gather materials and make copies of the Pre-Activity Worksheet, Activity Data Sheet and Post-Activity Worksheet, one each per student.
  • Provide enough floor space to run the experiment—a length of about 200 cm (~6 feet, 6 inches) is suggested. Use tape to mark the following distances from the starting location: 0 cm, 50 cm, 100 cm, 150 cm and the finish line at 200 cm. Track width can vary from wide enough to accommodate one LEGO robot to multiple lanes, which can expedite the testing process.
  • Build the EV3 robots, one per group, according to the 5-Minute Bot building instructions at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhe2jXi3Fc4. Either have instructors do this for all groups or provide time for students to assemble their robots in advance.
  • Download the EV3 robot program file, angularvelocity_program.rbt, and load it on to each group's EV3 intelligent brick. This program correlates directly to the data sheet.
  • Make sure that all the EV3 microcontroller (intelligent brick) batteries are fully charged.

With the Students

  1. Distribute a pre-activity worksheet to each student. Give students 10 minutes to complete their worksheets.
  2. As a class, spend five minutes discussing students' answers, angular velocity, linear velocity and real-world applications.
  3. Present to the class the Introduction/Motivation content.
  4. Hand out a data sheet to each student. As a class, have students estimate which of the robot's wheel configurations will result in the robot traveling the 200-cm distance in the fastest time.
  5. Divide the class into groups of three students each. Provide each group with a LEGO robot.
  6. Randomly assign each group a wheel configuration, making sure that approximately the same number of groups test each wheel configuration in the first round of testing. Direct students to use a ruler to measure the diameter and radius of their wheels and record the measurements on the data sheet.
  7. Based on the assigned wheel configuration, have students record on their data sheets their estimations for the fastest time for the robot to travel 200 cm. Later, students can compare their original estimations to the results they obtain throughout the activity.
  8. Have students get a feel for using the stopwatch and timing the robot as it passes the 50-cm, 100-cm, 150-cm marks and the 200-cm finish line. Point out that minimizing measurement tool and human errors helps to ensure the collection of accurate data.
  9. As each group's robot is placed at the start line, suggest the following student roles:
    • Have one team member be the timekeeper, using the stopwatch.
    • Assign another team member to record in the designation section of the data sheet the time taken to cross the 50-cm, 100 -m, 150-cm and 200-cm marks.
    • Have the third team member be in charge of starting and stopping the robot.
    • Students may trade roles if they like, but it is not required.
  1. Have each group start its robot, and proceed to measure and record the time taken for the robot to cross the four marks on the track. Repeat this process four times for a total of five trial runs. Expect this to be relatively quick considering the robot just needs to be restarted before each run.
  2. Have each group member write on his/her data sheet the recorded times from the timekeeper, and then begin to plot the data on the Linear Velocity Graph 1 on the data sheet, representing the linear velocity of the robot. Expect students to be able to draw an estimated line of best fit that represents their collected data. (Note: The slope of the line of best fit is equal to the average linear velocity.) Plotting the data enables them to examine their results visually as well as numerically, when discussing as a class.
  3. As a class, discuss which robot was the fastest by comparing each group's results together. This is a valuable exercise so students to see the correlation between each group's results since each group has different wheel sizes.
  4. Direct students to examine the data collected in the previous steps from each group in order to make inferences about the robot's wheel size and how it correlates to the speed.
  5. Using data from all groups in the class for wheel size and corresponding average linear velocity, have each student plot the data on the Angular Velocity Graph 1 and estimate a line of best fit for the data. Ask the students: How can you use the line of best fit to find the average angular velocity for the class? (Expect students to be familiar with the equation ν = ωr, which states that linear velocity equals angular velocity times radius. If they solve for angular velocity, ω, they find that ω = ν/r. Since the slope of the line is equal to y/x and in this case v/r, the slope of the line is equal to the average angular velocity of the class.)
  6. Have students calculate the angular velocity of their robots using the equation ω = ν/r and compare their robots' angular velocities to the average angular velocity for the class. Ideally, expect students to realize that even though robots from different groups traveled at different linear velocities, they all had the same angular velocity. Therefore, the linear velocity is dependent on the wheel size.
  7. Ensure that each student is following along and filling out the data sheet with the data as it becomes apparent through his/her own calculations as well as the classroom discussion.
    Two photographs of the LEGO robot, one with smaller-sized wheels (left) and the other with the larger-sized wheels (right).
    Two LEGO EV3 robots with different-sized wheels.
    copyright
    Copyright © 2014 AMPS, NYU-Poly
  8. By calculating the linear and angular velocities of the robot's data and determining their relationship, expect the class to be able to use the equation to come up with ideas on how to optimize their robots to increase speed performance. Wheel size can be altered. Another option is to increase the power at which the robots' motors run. This increases the angular velocity, and since the linear velocity is directly proportional (as long as the wheel size is consistent), it would likewise increase, thus optimizing the robot's speed.
  9. In their groups, have students make changes to their robots that they identify as appropriate for increasing the robot speed. Direct them to make one change at a time and then retest the robot. For example, students might first change the wheel size to see how that affects the robot speed. Then students can adjust the motor speed to see its affect. Each group's final robot design is the sum of all the adjustments its team members find necessary to create the fastest possible robot.
  10. As before, have groups test their robots five times, recording and graphing their results on the Linear Velocity Graph 2. Have students complete the data sheet questions.
  11. Lead a class discussion using the following questions (same questions as on the last page of the data sheet):
    • Which changes affected the robots most positively (achieved our engineering design objective of increased speed)? (Possible answer: Using the largest wheels available and the highest motor speed resulted in the highest linear velocity.)
    • What did you notice about the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity? Are they proportionally related—does angular velocity increase proportionally as with linear velocity? (Possible answer: If the wheel size is consistent, the linear velocity and angular velocity of the robot are proportionally related and increase or decrease proportionally. From the first round of tests when each group had different-sized wheels, it was apparent that when wheel sizes are different, robots can have the same angular velocity but different linear velocities.)
    • Did you find any drawbacks to using the performance-increasing adjustment? (Possible answer: In the case of increasing the motor power, one drawback is the battery being drained a bit faster. Depending on the situation, this might be a major engineering concern. For example, battery supply and use is of vital importance in extreme environments such as space, deep sea and arctic climates.)
  1. Distribute the post-activity worksheet and give students 10 minutes to complete it.
  2. As a class, review the post-activity worksheet. Specifically, focus on the relationships between linear velocity and angular velocity and how they relate to the data collected.
  3. Answer any class questions related to the material or prompted through the assessment.

Vocabulary/Definitions

angular velocity: The rate of change of angular position of a rotating body. Typical units are radians per second or revolutions per minute (RPM).

diameter: A line segment that passes through the center of a circle (or sphere), with both endpoints on the circle (or sphere).

linear velocity: The rate of change of an object's position, or speed of the object, in a straight line. Typical units are meters per second or miles per hour.

velocity: The speed of an object in a given direction.

Assessment

Pre-Activity Assessment

Pre-Activity Worksheet: Before the activity, have students complete the six-question Pre-Activity Worksheet. As a class, discuss student answers to assess their baseline knowledge of angular velocity and linear velocity as well as their understanding of its real-world applications.

Activity Embedded Assessment

Activity Data Sheet: Have students use the Activity Data Sheet to guide them through the activity, record and graph data, and reply to questions. Review their answers and class discussion contributions to gauge their depth of comprehension.

Post-Activity Assessment

Post-Activity Worksheet: At activity end, administer the Post-Activity Worksheet to assess student understanding of the material and see if their scores increase from the pre-activity assessment. The pre- and post-activity questions are exactly the same, except one more question is added to the post-activity worksheet: Think outside of the box! Why do different vehicles—tractors, trucks, sports cars and SUVs—have different wheel sizes? What wheel size would you want on your vehicle and why?

Additional Multimedia Support

To construct the LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robot for this activity, follow the 5 Minute Bot building instructions at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhe2jXi3Fc4.

Suggested alternative robotic kits that allow you to vary the speed of the motor that controls the wheels:

Subscribe

Get the inside scoop on all things TeachEngineering such as new site features, curriculum updates, video releases, and more by signing up for our newsletter!
PS: We do not share personal information or emails with anyone.

More Curriculum Like This

Upper Elementary Activity
Gears: Determining Angular Velocity

Students work as engineers and learn to conduct controlled experiments by changing one experimental variable at a time to study its effect on the experiment outcome. Student groups assemble LEGO® MINDSTORMS® EV3 robots with variously sized gears in a gear train and then design programs using the EV...

High School Lesson
A Tale of Friction

High school students learn how engineers mathematically design roller coaster paths using the approach that a curved path can be approximated by a sequence of many short inclines. They apply basic calculus and the work-energy theorem for non-conservative forces to quantify the friction along a curve...

Middle School Lesson
Ring around the Rosie

Students learn the concept of angular momentum and its correlation to mass, velocity and radius. In an associated literacy activity, students use basic methods of comparative mythology to consider why spinning and weaving are common motifs in creation myths and folktales.

Copyright

© 2015 by Regents of the University of Colorado; original © 2014 Polytechnic Institute of New York University

Contributors

James Muldoon, Kelly Brandon, Jigar Jadav

Supporting Program

AMPS GK-12 Program, Polytechnic Institute of New York University

Acknowledgements

This activity was developed by the Applying Mechatronics to Promote Science (AMPS) Program in the School of Engineering, funded by National Science Foundation GK-12 grant no. 0741714. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policies of the NSF, and you should not assume endorsement by the federal government.

Last modified: September 19, 2023

Free K-12 standards-aligned STEM curriculum for educators everywhere.
Find more at TeachEngineering.org